Voter Guide for November 4, 2014

RLCCA Voter Guide November 2014 [PDF]

The Republican Liberty Caucus of California (RLCCA) has released its November 4,¬†2014 mid-term¬†endorsements and the L.A. County chapter stands with them. Click above for the guide, or if you’re averse to PDF files, read ahead:

Vote for Art Alas – 32nd Congressional District (San Gabriel Valley, El Monte, Covina)
Vote for Matthew Munson – 20th Senate District (San Fernando Valley, Pomona)
Vote for Zachary Taylor – 46th Assembly District (Thousand Oaks)

Vote NO on Proposition 1 – Water Quality, Support, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014
This measure would authorize the state to borrow $7.1 billion for an assortment of water infrastructure projects. While the ongoing drought demonstrates the shortcomings of California’s current water infrastructure, adding billions more to California’s existing $300 billion state debt is not the right answer. The work proposed in Prop 1 should have been paid for on an ongoing basis out of the fees families, farmers, and businesses pay for the water they use. A vote for Prop 1 is a vote to bail out Sacramento for squandering this money.

Vote NO on Proposition 2 – Budget Stabilization Account
Planning a small surplus into the state budget during good years in order to cover shortfalls in bad years is an appealing idea, but Prop 2 is not the way to do it. Until California’s state debt is paid off, dipping into a reserve fund is equivalent to borrowing money, and Prop 2 gives the governor the unilateral authority to do so. In addition, Prop 2 also contains troubling provisions micromanaging school districts and incentivizing them to overspend in order to avoid having their local budget reserve funds confiscated by Sacramento.

Vote NO on Proposition 45 – Health Insurance Rate Change
This measure would put the state’s Insurance Commissioner in charge of approving or rejecting any proposed rate change in individual or small group health insurance premiums and would limit the ability of providers of other types of insurance to price according to the estimated risk of a particular policyholder. Both are terrible ideas. Insurance only works when prices are set appropriately with regards to estimated risk, and price fixing in any market tends to break the improper functioning of the market and create shortages.

Vote NO on Proposition 46 – Drug and Alcohol Testing of Doctors
This measure would require doctors to be regularly tested for drugs and alcohol. Pervasive drug and alcohol tests are expensive, intrusive, and unreliable; people who are abusing drugs can often easily fool the tests, while people who are not may test positive anyway. The state should stay out of the matter, give doctors the same presumption of innocence we give to the rest of the population, and trust hospitals to take appropriate measures to discipline their own employees.

Vote YES on Proposition 47 – Criminal Sentences, Misdemeanor Penalties
California has a number of crimes on the book that prosecutors can charge as either felonies or misdemeanors. These crimes include petty theft and various nonviolent drug offenses. Prop 47 would require prosecutors to charge those specific crimes as misdemeanors instead of felonies except when the defendant has prior convictions for violent or serious felonies, and would commute the sentences of current inmates serving felony sentences for those crimes who cannot be shown to present an unreasonable public safety risk. This would do better justice by not over-sentencing minor offenders, save taxpayer money, and keep prison space open for truly dangerous criminals.

Vote YES on Proposition 48 – Indian Gaming
Compacts This measure ratifies certain tribal gaming compacts already approved by the legislature, in particular allowing the North Fork Tribe to build and operate a casino in Mandera county. The RLCCA supports the sovereign rights of the tribes, as well as the rights of all people to buy and sell legitimate goods and services, including gaming.

One thought on “Voter Guide for November 4, 2014

  1. You might wish to share some additional information on Prop. 1. Yes, we are currently in a severe drought, but this bond won’t help it. It’s payback to all the crazy environmental agencies who want to control your lives and your lands. There is a small amount of money (compared to the bond total) allotted for building some infra-structure but no money allotted to transport the water where it is needed. If all this is so desperately needed, why did certain forces allow 800,000 acre feet of water to be run off into the ocean? This bond is a SCAM in caps!

    On the other hand, I really have to take issue with RLC on Propositions 47 and 48. Prop 47 is another go at AB 109, that released over 10,000 criminals into our neighborhoods. It’s not really about changing the criteria for sentencing. I advocate No on 47.

    Prop 48 will allow the camel’s nose under the tent. Pretty soon every tribe will argue, “well, you let them do it; why not us?” Soon it won’t only be Indian tribes, it’ll be other special interests.

    Do we REALLY want to encourage more and more gambling (which has its moral issues) as a way to raise money? Wouldn’t it be better to focus on lowering taxes, electing Pete Peterson as Secty of State to clean up the voter rolls (for a more honest vote) and reworking the regulations, processes and costs of starting a new business in this state to stem the flow of businesses out of state and encourage new start-ups? Statistics show that more new jobs are created by new start-up businesses than by large established companies. I see that as a better way to increase revenue than to encourage gambling. I advocate No on 48.

Comments are closed.